Rules of argumentation for the utilization in persuasive essays
If you want to write good persuasive essay, you should utilize enough arguments and employ them precisely. Arguments must persuade your reader making him alter his point or mind of view.
Which are the most elementary rules of giving arguments?
- 1. Operate with simple, clear, precise and convincing ideas, as persuasiveness can be simply "drowned" in an ocean of terms and arguments, especially if they're unclear and inaccurate; the interlocutor "hears" or understands never as than he wants to show.
- 2. The pace and manner associated with the argument should correspond towards the temperament associated with the writer:
- arguments and evidence, explained separately, are much more efficient in reaching the goal than if they're presented all at one time;
- 3 or 4 bright arguments achieve a better impact than numerous meaningless arguments;
- argumentation ought not to be declarative or look like a monologue associated with the "protagonist";
- appropriate pauses frequently exert a greater impact compared to flow of terms;
- the interlocutor is way better influenced by the active construction regarding the expression compared to the passive regarding proof (for instance, it is best to say "we will do so" than "can be achieved).
- 3. The thinking should really be correct according to the reader. This means:
- always openly admit rightness associated with the opinion that is opposite it is right, regardless of if it may have unfavorable consequences for your needs. Thus giving your interlocutor the chance to expect exactly the same behavior from the opposing side. In addition, in that way, that you don't violate the ethics;
- it is advisable to try only using those arguments which is writers help accepted because of the reader. Attempt to read him mind in advance and speak the exact same language;
- avoid phrases that are empty they suggest a weakening of attention and induce unneeded pauses so that you can gain some time get the lost thread associated with discussion (as an example, "as was said," or "in other words," "more or less," "along with all the noticeable", "It is achievable and thus, and so", "it had not been said", etc.).
When arguments that are giving perform some following
It is important to adapt arguments into the individual associated with the audience, ie:
- build arguments in line with the objectives and motives associated with interlocutor;
- remember that "excessive" persuasiveness provokes rebuff from the subordinate, especially if he's got an "aggressive" nature (the "boomerang" effect);
- avoid expressions that are nondeval formulations making it tough to argue and understand;
- attempt to present towards the employee whenever you can the data, a few ideas and considerations.
Recall the proverb: "It is far better to see once than hear a hundred times." Bringing vivid comparisons and artistic arguments, you will need to remember that comparisons should always be on the basis of the experience of your reader, otherwise you will have no result, they must support and strengthen the writer's argumentation, be convincing, but without exaggeration and extremes that cause the mistrust for the performer and thereby put under question most of the parallels. & Most importantly, you must respect the reader and get honest with him.